Factory Automation: Enhanced Reliability with FeRAM

A Case Study on Human-Machine Interfaces for Robotic Systems

In modern factory automation (FA) environments, minimizing system downtime and enhancing operational continuity are critical objectives. Robotic systems, particularly those relying on Human-Machine Interfaces (HMIs), require memory components capable of high-speed data writing, non-volatility, and resilience under harsh operating conditions.

This white paper examines the deployment of Ferroelectric Random Access Memory (FeRAM) in robotic HMIs and contrasts its performance with traditional Electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EEPROM). Through technical evaluation, comparative benchmarks, and real-world case analysis, the paper demonstrates why FeRAM represents a superior choice for high-reliability, low-latency factory automation applications.

1. Introduction

Industry 4.0 has ushered in a wave of digital transformation across industrial sectors, demanding real-time data management, automation robustness, and intelligent control systems. Memory technologies used in HMIs play a pivotal role in ensuring that robotic systems operate with consistency and recover rapidly from power disruptions.

This paper focuses on FeRAM, a non-volatile memory technology that meets these stringent requirements, and details its advantages over EEPROM in robotic HMIs.

2. Technical Background

2.1 FeRAM Architecture

FeRAM stores data using a ferroelectric layer in the capacitor structure, allowing for high-speed switching and non-volatility. Unlike EEPROM, which uses charge storage mechanisms requiring high-voltage operations and time-consuming erase cycles, FeRAM offers near-SRAM performance with the benefits of non-volatility.

2.2 High-Speed Data Logging

Parameter	FeRAM	EEPROM
Write Speed	50-150 ns	1-10 ms
Endurance (Write Cycles)	>10^10 - 10^15	~10^5 - 10^6
Power Failure Resilience	Immediate Write Commit	Vulnerable (Buffered)
Data Retention	>10 years	>10 years
Energy Consumption	Low	Higher (due to erase/write cycles)
Recovery Time After Failure	Instantaneous	Requires manual reset, longer
Data Integrity on Power Loss	Secure, no loss	Risk of incomplete writes

3. Robotic HMIs

3.1 System Requirements

Robotic systems in FA environments require non-volatile memory for the storage of:

Actuator parameters (e.g., joint angles, torque levels)
Dynamic control data (e.g., position, velocity)
Environmental feedback (e.g., sensor inputs)

3.2 Limitations of EEPROM

Despite widespread use, EEPROM is fundamentally constrained by:

Slow write speeds leading to system lag during frequent updates
Low endurance, especially problematic under continuous motion control operations
Susceptibility to power loss, causing frequent data corruption or loss

3.3 Advantages of FeRAM in Robotic HMIs

FeRAM addresses all limitations of EEPROM:

Enables real-time data logging with minimal latency
Ensures instant data retention during unexpected shutdowns
Supports frequent writes without degradation, extending system lifespan

4. Case Study: FeRAM Integration in a Precision Robotics Manufacturing Facility

Background:

A high-precision assembly line utilized EEPROM-based HMIs to control robotic arms. Recurrent power disruptions led to repeated data loss, requiring manual reconfiguration after each incident.

Challenges:

Downtime averaged 15–20 minutes per incident
Operator stress due to frequent data recovery requirements
Loss of production efficiency due to parameter resets

Solution:

Transition to FeRAM modules (MB85RC256V, MB85RS1MT) allowed for real-time write capability and robust data retention.

Outcomes:

>80% reduction in recovery time after power failures
Zero data loss incidents over 12 months
Increase in operational efficiency by ~12%
Enhanced operator confidence and focus on value-added tasks

Challenges:

Downtime averaged 15–20 minutes per incident
Operator stress due to frequent data recovery requirements
Loss of production efficiency due to parameter resets

Solution:

Transition to FeRAM modules (MB85RC256V, MB85RS1MT) allowed for real-time write capability and robust data retention.

Outcomes:

>80% reduction in recovery time after power failures
Zero data loss incidents over 12 months
Increase in operational efficiency by ~12%
Enhanced operator confidence and focus on value-added tasks

Factory Automation: Enhanced Reliability with FeRAM

A Case Study on Human-Machine Interfaces for Robotic Systems

1. Introduction

2. Technical Background

2.1 FeRAM Architecture

2.2 High-Speed Data Logging

3. Robotic HMIs

3.1 System Requirements

3.2 Limitations of EEPROM

3.3 Advantages of FeRAM in Robotic HMIs

4. Case Study: FeRAM Integration in a Precision Robotics Manufacturing Facility

Background:

Challenges:

Solution:

Outcomes:

Challenges:

Solution:

Outcomes:

5. Typical FeRAM Components for Industrial Use

Factory Automation: Enhanced Reliability with FeRAM

A Case Study on Human-Machine Interfaces for Robotic Systems

1. Introduction

2. Technical Background

2.1 FeRAM Architecture

2.2 High-Speed Data Logging

3. Robotic HMIs

3.1 System Requirements

3.2 Limitations of EEPROM

3.3 Advantages of FeRAM in Robotic HMIs

4. Case Study: FeRAM Integration in a Precision Robotics Manufacturing Facility

Background:

Challenges:

Solution:

Outcomes:

Challenges:

Solution:

Outcomes:

5. Typical FeRAM Components for Industrial Use

6. Conclusion

6. Conclusion